공지사항 HOME > 뉴스센터 > 공지사항 > 원산 공지사항

[해외 뉴스포커스] Atoms for Pyongyang Let North Korea Have Peaceful Nuclear Power
운영자 / Date : 2017-06-02 15:12:38 / Hit : 2,027 인쇄하기

<Foreign Affairs>

May 23, 2017

Atoms for Pyongyang

Let North Korea Have Peaceful Nuclear Power


By Richard Rhodes and Michael Shellenberger


Earlier this month, U.S. President Donald Trump said that “under the right circumstances,” he would meet with North Korean President Kim Jong Un, who continues to increase his nation’s nuclear arsenal. With the recent election in South Korea of President Moon Jae-in, who campaigned for renewed negotiations between the two Koreas, the circumstances might indeed be just right.


Kim Jong Un has repeatedly stated that he wants the same thing North Korea’s previous leaders—his father, Kim Jong Il, and grandfather Kim Il Sung—wanted: first, assurance that North Korea won’t be invaded again, and second, electricity for economic development to replace the hydropower capacity the United States destroyed with massive strategic bombing in the first years of the Korean War, which was fought from 1950 to 1953. These were the two demands North Korea made, and the Clinton administration agreed to, in 1994, when North Korea pledged to stop producing plutonium in exchange for nuclear power plants.


North Korea’s president is fully aware that attacking the United States would be tantamount to suicide. In 2000, as President Kim Jong Il told a South Korean newspaper publisher, “[Our] missiles cannot reach the United States, and if I launched them the U.S. would fire a thousand missiles back and we would not survive. I know that very well. But I have to let them know I have missiles. I am making them because only then will the United States talk to me.” Shortly thereafter, during a visit to North Korea by Secretary of State Madeleine Albright, he agreed to a moratorium on missile construction.


The 1994 energy-for-weapons agreement worked until the 9/11 terrorist attacks, after which U.S. President George W. Bush claimed that North Korea was part of a so-called axis of evil with Iraq and Iran. Two years later, the United States invaded Iraq. North Korean leaders quite rationally concluded that Iraq’s mistake was not its pursuit of a weapon but rather its failure to build one. They conducted their first nuclear weapons test three years later, in 2006. Washington’s continued pursuit of a failed strategy is evidence that it, not Pyongyang, is the irrational actor.


The Obama administration largely continued the Bush administration’s hardline approach to North Korea, to even worse results. Not only is North Korea closer than ever to producing an intercontinental ballistic missile that can reach the United States—its people remain mired in poverty thanks in part to a lack of abundant or reliable electricity. Satellite images show a brightly lit South Korea—one-third of whose power comes from nuclear power plants—casting a glare over an almost entirely dark North Korea.


Washington’s continued pursuit of a failed strategy is evidence that it, not Pyongyang, is the irrational actor. Threatening North Korea with military action, as Trump has done, only deepens its leaders’ conviction that they need a sizable nuclear deterrent to protect themselves. By contrast, promising not to attack—and helping North Korea gain access to nuclear energy in exchange for limiting its nuclear arsenal and missile development—gives it reason to stop threatening its neighbors and creates a powerful economic incentive for it to cease exporting missiles and other military contraband.


Constructive engagement is critical for achieving peace on the Korean peninsula and, eventually, freedom for the North Korean people. The failure of the United States to impose democracy in Afghanistan and Iraq stands in marked contrast with the gradual, multi-decade transition from dictatorships to democracy by many other nations around the world, from Europe to Latin America to much of Asia.


Indeed, there is no mystery to how peaceful and gradual regime change occurs. Rising prosperity increases popular demands for freedom and inspires the children and grandchildren of hereditary dynasties to loosen their grip on power. South Korea is no exception. Even though it regularly held elections, that U.S. ally was effectively a military dictatorship until 1987, when a national referendum approved a new constitution that allowed direct elections, including that of the president. Between 1980 and 1990, per-capita income nearly quadrupled, from $1,778 to $6,642.


Conservative hawks who seek a military solution to the Korean problem are not the only ones at fault. Liberal doves who oppose nuclear power are equally to blame. Since the Carter administration, Democrats have sought to restrict access to nuclear energy by poor nations and to punish nations such as India and Pakistan that acquired a weapon after the nuclear nonproliferation treaty (NPT) was ratified, blocking their efforts to scale up nuclear energy production. Democrats have long sought to prevent nations—even those that have already become nuclear-weapons states—from reprocessing spent nuclear fuel because they fear the separated plutonium might be used for weapons, even though the NPT explicitly gives its signatories the right to do so and reactor-grade plutonium is unreliable for weapons use.


As an outsider, Trump has the opportunity to break from both extremes and finally realize the “Atoms for Peace” vision that U.S. President Dwight Eisenhower outlined at the United Nations in 1953, five months after the end of the Korean War. Eisenhower, a former general deeply committed to alleviating the conditions that lead to military conflict, called for nuclear power development to supply “abundant electrical energy in the power-starved areas of the world.” Working through the United Nations’ International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the United States provided nations with research reactors and the training to use them, while maintaining oversight of weapons-grade materials.


Given Trump’s bellicose rhetoric toward North Korea, his moving to open negotiations with the Hermit Kingdom may seem unlikely. Yet he has frequently criticized the U.S. invasion of Iraq as well as the Obama administration’s handling of North Korea, and he is a professed supporter of nuclear energy. That industry, despite having significant export potential, is currently struggling for survival in the United States against heavily subsidized renewables and cheap natural gas.


In seeking an atoms-for-peace deal with North Korea, Trump can build on humankind’s successes in reducing the threat of nuclear conflict. Thanks in large measure to an agreement negotiated by another Republican president, Ronald Reagan, the United States and Russia have reduced their total number of operational nuclear warheads from 30,000 in the late 1960s to 1,500 today. The CIA estimates that more than 30 nations have the technical capacity to develop nuclear weapons. Only nine have chosen to do so. In short, for more than 70 years, nations have successfully avoided the use of atoms for war. What’s missing now is the expansion of atoms for peace—on the Korean peninsula and beyond.


* Foreign Affairs

Since its founding in 1922, Foreign Affairs has been the leading forum for serious discussion of American foreign policy and global affairs. Foreign Affairs is published by the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), a non-profit and nonpartisan membership organization dedicated to improving the understanding of U.S. foreign policy and international affairs through the free exchange of ideas.


* Richard Rhodes is the author of the Pulitzer Prize-winning history The Making of the Atomic Bomb.


* Michael Shellenberger is president of Environmental Progress, a research and policy organization.


첨부파일 : 파일없음

Total 645
공지사항 게시판
번호 제목 작성일
공지 「2017 한국원산 단체회원사 실무자 간담회」 개최 2017.11.10
공지 [교육개최] 2017 하반기 원자력 품질보증교육[기본과정] 개최 안내 (11. 28. ~ 11. 30. / 서울) 2017.11.10
공지 [입찰공고] 제7회 원자력 안전 및 진흥의 날 『운영 용역업체』 입찰공고(긴급) 2017.11.09
공지 2017 원전해체 비즈니스 포럼 개최 및 참가신청 안내 2017.11.09
641 월간 원자력산업 10월호 발간 2017.10.30
640 미래원자력 연구개발 패러다임 및 산학연 협력방향 모색 세미나 개최 안내_11.7 2017.10.26
639 [보도자료] 신고리 5,6호기 건설 재개 권고와 관련해 국민 여러분께 드리는 글 2017.10.20
638 월간 원자력산업 9월호 발간 2017.09.29
637 2017 일본 원자력시설 제염해체 현장견학 안내 2017.09.14
636 「산‧학‧연 협력 원자력 R&D 활성화 세미나」 개최 안내 2017.09.14
635 2017 원자력인명록 발간 2017.09.13
634 [신청마감] 제34회 한-일 원자력산업세미나 개최 및 참가 안내 2017.09.06
633 제193차 원자력계 조찬강연회_9.29 개최 안내 2017.09.06
632 월간 원자력산업 8월호 발간 2017.09.01
631 중소기업 품질시스템 구축 지원사업 2차 시행 공고 2017.08.31
630 2017 하반기 원자력시설 제염해체기술 전문교육 및 일본 원자력시설 제염해체 현장견학 개최 안내 2017.08.18
629 2017 하반기 원자력 품질보증교육[기본과정] 개최 연기 안내 2017.08.18
628 한∙미 선진원자로(GEN IV) 협력증진 세미나 개최 안내 2017.08.01
627 공론화委냐 정부냐… '원전' 결정 주체, 시작부터 혼선_7월 28일 원자력 투데이뉴스 2017.07.28
626 2017 세계 원자력발전의 현황과 동향 발간 안내 2017.07.17
625 월간 원자력산업 6월호 발간 2017.07.04
624 제22회 원자력산업실태조사_조사표 2017.07.01
623 2017 한국원산 임직원 워크숍 알림_6.30(금) 2017.06.29
622 2017 원자력연감 발간 안내 2017.06.13
621 고리 1호기 퇴역 기념 심포지엄_6.8 개최 안내 2017.06.02
NOW [해외 뉴스포커스] Atoms for Pyongyang Let North Korea Have Peaceful Nuclear Power 2017.06.02
619 [보도자료] 고리 1호기 퇴역기념 심포지엄 개최_6.8 2017.05.31
618 산업계 수요 연계 원자력 R&D 활성화 세미나 개최 안내 2017.05.11
617 제191차 원자력계 조찬강연회 개최_5.26(금) 2017.05.10
616 [해외 뉴스포커스] "대한민국, 세계 원자력산업 강국으로 군림하고자 할 것" 2017.04.28